Tuesday, March 3, 2009

Acceptance

This class has pushed us all to delve deep into the issues of race and racism. After reading various writings by philosophers on the subject and then discussing it in class, I have come to realize a few things. First, while I knew going into the class that racism is still present in America today. I truly underestimated America’s racist society until this semester. Yes, we have much to be proud of in America from getting rid of slavery to electing our first black president in history. However, there is so much more to be done to eliminate racism. Even though we do not segregate and restrict races lawfully anymore, there is still much segregation in the world solely because of skin color and what that physical attribute means to people. While I would be more hesitant to agree with Fanon before taking this class, I tend to agree with him now in his theory that we are all racists. The term racist though is still very fluid in its meaning, but I can admit that I am guilty of thinking some racist thoughts. For example, turning to the Asian guy in my math class for help because he must be smart or assuming that the black guy on the track team is fast. While I catch myself after thinking these things because I know that my thinking is prejudice and irrational, I also know that I am not alone in having prejudice thoughts. Therefore, we NEED to change our fears and prejudices about race and accept each race for our differences.
Cat’s blog reference to Obama peeked my interest and inspired me to watch President Barack Obama’s Philadelphia Speech “A More Perfect Union.” In this speech by our first African American President, President Obama talks about our need for union during our current struggle with war, the economy, etc. He recognizes the fact that there is still a division between people and while he does not limit this divide to race, he does stress race as one of Americas major causes of division. In the speech, Obama emphasizes that it does not matter our skin color, our economic backgrounds, our political stance, where we grew up, etc. We are all Americans and all share similar issues that have no tie to race. This brought me back to the ideas of Montagu, who wanted to take the term “race” out of our vocabulary entirely. While it would be nice to have a world that judged people solely by their personalities and not by their skin color, it is an idea that realistically is impossible. People will always make distinctions by race whether appropriate or not. Now, what made me think of Montagu during the Obama speech was that Obama suggests that he knows that each American comes from a different background and different race. However, he believes that this should not deter us from accepting our similarities and in that acceptance, we should be able to get past our racial differences and unite together.
This speech made me think not only do we need to unite together over our similarities, but also accept eachother’s differences as well. Many believe that in order to rid ourselves of racism, we need to become a colorblind society. I say, this colorblind society should not and will not ever exist. To say that when you see someone you don’t see them as Black, Asian, White, etc. is just false. It is not shameful to see one’s color. It is part of one’s identity. However, we need to create a society that does not define people by their race. Instead we need to create a society that accepts people for their differences, one in which we can coexist, but also relate to eachother. I am not saying this will be an easy trek, it has yet to be, but unless society actually begins to accept people for who they are rather than what stereotypes their race plays out for them, there will not be any sort of progression towards the movement to end racism.

7 comments:

  1. "For example, turning to the Asian guy in my math class for help because he must be smart or assuming that the black guy on the track team is fast. While I catch myself after thinking these things because I know that my thinking is prejudice and irrational, I also know that I am not alone in having prejudice thoughts."

    My question is whether or not your assumptions are actually irrational. We live in a world based on empiricism and base many assumptions on that very empiricism. If you have observed asians generally excelling at math or african-americans generally being faster runners over a significant period of time, it seems only *rational* that you'd come to those conclusions and apply them as necessary. Your assumptions certainly are dependent on racial distinction, but that doesn't immediately make them lack rationality.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with Steven. I am from right outside of Memphis, and growing up there was not a large Asian population in my area. I never knew the stereotype was that Asian people were supposely great at math or exceptionally smart, in general.

    Going back to your post, however, I think while it is hard to say "I am a racist" it is because we take the term "racist" to be in its most negative meaning. I can say "I am a racsit" because I do see people's race [when defining it as the color of one's skin.] However, after an experience I had a couple of weekends ago, maybe I am defining race as skin color AND physical characteristics. While in a restaurant, I noticed an albino man. Before I knew it, I caught myself referring to him as a Black albino man. Why? Because of his facial features. Immediately I thought about our class discussions.

    I agree that being colorblind should not be the ultimate goal, but instead we should strive not to focus on our differences but rather our similarities.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Just because you've noticed Asian people being good at math doesn't mean you can assume all Asian people are. That is irrational. That also means that you are assuming that white people can't dance, which i believe is false. These stereotypes are exactly the kind of thing that keep people segregated, and stop of from overcoming our differences.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I also agree with Steven to some extent. In reading the first paragraph of this post I couldn't help but wonder why these assumptions are harmful. Of course there are countless destructive racial assumptions that are made every day, but is being good at math really a hurtful thing to be accused of? I realize that it isn't my place to make this judgement, I'm just trying to understand where the line is drawn (if there is a line) between innocent and harmful prejudice.

    ReplyDelete
  5. That is a good point Christa. Perhaps the fundamental idea behind any prejudice is segregative. Could the argument be made, however, that we should not abolish any sign of difference for the sake of overcoming them, but embrace them? Should we celebrate differences as well as similarities?

    ReplyDelete
  6. The use of inductive reasoning almost always fails, and thus the logic here will inevitably fail. The problem also arises that; if you see some asian people performing well and assume that asians generally perform well, you will likely also assume that one group will perform poorly if you see a few people from that same group performing poorly......thus racism. What you are doing is trying to attribute biological factors to race (i.e. smartness or athleticism) which will fail, because even asia has its slower thinkers. I would recommend that you observe the behaviors of individuals on an individual basis, and assume that everyone will not adhere to some stereotype. Using this identification system, you will judge people based on their own merit instead of the merit of others. Stereotypes will never illustrate the attributes of every person in the group stereotyped, otherwise they would just be rigid designators for the group. Saying that asians are generally shorter than other races is a stereotype (though one that can be verified though easy empirical research), and if a blind person, who believed those stereotypes, met Yao Ming, s/he's idea of asian people would not account for him. The interesting thing here is that we do not find this as controversial because we can see that he is tall, whereas if we tried to make an assumption about his inner self we would probably be wrong and he would probably be more offended. Why?

    ReplyDelete
  7. ...I don't know what you're talking about with regard to inductive reasoning Walter. If the sample size is large enough, diverse enough in relevant factors, and not biased, then there is nothing wrong with inductive reasoning to reach any sort of generalization. The certainty of the results will not nec. be 100% , but there will be a high rate of correlation that the the inductive generalization is basically right within a small range of deviation.

    And actually, if the blind person wasn't over-generalizing, he would be able to account for Yao Ming (if we assume that Asians are typically shorter; I'm skepitcal, but w/e if we empirically verify it), as he wouldn't take it to mean "all asians must be shorter than me" he would take it as something like "ok...I'm 6'4" so there is an x% probability that this asian dude who I can't see is taller than me."

    The problem here is that the stereotypes formed that we are talking about don't pass these tests, and so are inaccurate [i] over-generalizations [/i] which attribute certain qualities to particular groups. Another problem is that stereotypes about race are almost always used to justify some other sort of unsubstantiated normative racial claim (i.e. even if someone is right that minorities make up X% of the prison system in the US, it does not follow that they are inherently predisposed to steal, rape, and murder.)

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.